Join YFEL
Apply Now

by Laura Andrea Acosta Figueredo, YFEL 2020 Member

The average crude oil production for the year 2018 in Colombia, until August was 858 KBPD (Thousand Barrels Per Day) [1], of which for each barrel of crude produced, 11.6 barrels of water on average [2]. These contain phenolic compounds between 98 and 128 mg/L [3], very high values ​​compared to the maximum permissible limits required by Resolution 0631 of 2015 in Colombia, reported as 0.20 mg/L [4]. It represents a serious discharge problem due to its low biodegradability, high toxicity, as well as causing considerable damage to Ecosystems and human health.

The Fenton process with ultraviolet light, different concentrations of Fe2+ and H2O2 has proven highly effective and is positioned as an economically viable alternative for the elimination of toxic and persistent pollutants. Allows the oxidation of phenol in the best case to CO2 and H2O [5].

The use of solid waste as a catalyst is proposed, such as fly ash, whose estimated total annual global generation is 7.5 x 103 t/year. It has a very attractive chemical composition to be used in the Photo-Fenton process due to the presence of iron oxide and TiO2 in the structure [6].

Image 2. Magdalena Valley

Image 2. Fly ash

 

The characterization of fly ash from the waste of Termotasajero S.A. thermoelectric was carried out, for which X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), molecular adsorption (BET) and morphology tests were performed.

 

The variables of fly ash and peroxide concentration were taken as variables (Table 1). Two targets were made to check the effect of ash and peroxide in the presence of LED light on a concentration of 50 ppm of phenol, finding the degradation percentages are not significant in any of the cases. Then, several of the 4 of the 9 tests proposed at 30 ° C and with a pH of 3 were carried out.

 

Variable

Units

Range

C,H2O2

mM

5

12,5

20

C,Fly ash

g/L

0,2

0,6

1,0

Table 1. Ranges of the variables proposed

 

To monitor the degradation, the 4-aminoantipyrine colorimetric method was used, from which a colored reaction is generated and the absorbance of the samples with respect to time was taken.

 

100% degradation of the phenol concentration of a 50-ppm solution was achieved in 140 minutes, from the addition of 12.5 mM H2O2 and 5.55 g/L of fly ash.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

  1. Degradation

  1. Determination[7]

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

Fly Ash characterization

The smallest diameter was 0.54 μm and the largest was 67.85 μm, with a standard deviation of 3.09 μm, showing that its distribution is heterogeneous. The particles are predominantly spherical in shape (left) and consist of solid spheres and porous unburned carbon (right).

Image 3. SEM (left) and TEM (right) micrographs of fly ash from Termotasajero

 

This suggests that once the ash is involved in the catalytic photo process, the Photo-Fenton process prevails over heterogeneous photocatalysis by titanium dioxide

 

Chemical Composition (% w/w)

SiO2

TiO2

Al2O3

Fe2O3

MnO

MgO

CaO

Na2O

K2O

P2O5

SO3

BaO

51.49

1.08

26.37

9.37

N.D.

0.32

0.63

N.D.

1.05

0.13

0.30

0.14

Table 2. Chemical Composition (% w/w) of Fly Ash from Termotasajero S.A

 

The X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD) for the ash sample revealed the presence of the mineralogical phases: Mullite (31,5%), Quartz (9,7%), Magnetite (2,3%), Amorphous (55,8%).

Image 4. X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD) of fly ash from Termotasajero S.A.

 

Phenol Degradation

 

Graph 1. X,Phenol (%) vs. time (min)

 

  • LED light favors the development of the Photo-Fenton reaction.
  • It is possible to degrade the phenol content using a Photo-Fenton reaction using fly ash as a catalyst.
  • 100% degradation of the phenol present in a 50-ppm solution was achieved in 140 minutes, using 1.11 g of fly ash and or 0.40 mL of H2O2 at pH 3 and 30 °C

 

Future Work

 

  • Evaluate the efficiency of the phenol degradation process using the Photo-Fenton reaction with a real water sample.
  • Perform tests in a continuous reactor.
  • Think about the escalation of this process.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. «Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos de Colombia,» [En línea]. Available: http://www.anh.gov.co/Operaciones-Regalias-y-Participaciones/Sistema-Integrado-de-Operaciones/Paginas/Estadisticas-de-Produccion.aspx.
  2. Ecopetrol S.A., «Reporte Integrado de Gestión Sostenible 2016,» 2017.
  3. A. Coelho, A. Castro, M. Dezotti y G. Sant’Anna, «Treatment of petroleum refinery sour water by advanced oxidation processes,» pp. 178-184, 2006.
  4. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible, «Resolución 0631,» 2015.
  5. A. Rubio-Clemente, E. Chica y G. Peñuela, «Aplicación del proceso Fenton en el tratamiento de aguas residuales de origen petroquímico,» Ingeniería y Competitividad, vol. 16, nº 2, pp. 211-223, 2014.
  6. R. J. M, C. Santos, L. Cambronero, F. Corpas, F. Alfonso y A. J. Moraño, «Aprovechamiento de las cenizas volantes, clase F, de centrales térmicas para la fabricación de materiales cerámicos,» Cerámica y Vidrio, vol. 39, nº 3, pp. 229-231, 2000.
  7. ASTM, D1783-01: Standard Test Methods for Phenolic Compounds in Water, 2015